Blog
Rethinking 5 assumptions about data center power
The FCC’s recent actions on several foreign-produced connected infrastructure and autonomous systems highlight a broader reality: Regulatory change, cybersecurity, and supply chain strategy are increasingly interconnected
When the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently expanded its Covered List to include certain foreign-produced consumer-grade routers, uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS) and UAS critical components, power inverters, and advanced robotic devices, the headlines focused on the national security and public safety concerns these rulings were designed to address. But for connected device manufacturers, an equally important consideration may be: What do they signal about the future operating environment?
The FCC’s actions on routers, drones, inverters, and robots are not occurring in isolation. Around the world, governments are introducing new cybersecurity requirements, import/export controls, supplier scrutiny measures, and technology regulations that increasingly affect where products are designed, manufactured, and sold. For original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), the implications extend beyond compliance to operational and supply chain mandates. The challenge is not preparing for a single regulation; it’s building an organization capable of adapting quickly to ongoing regulatory change.
The recent FCC changes are the first major Covered List actions based on where equipment is produced rather than targeting a specific company. The rulings go beyond manufacturing to encompass design, development, and assembly, narrowing in on technical characteristics, supply chain provenance, and broader manufacturing considerations such as onshoring. Legal and policy analysts have noted that the rulings reflect an expanding regulatory focus on connected technologies and the ecosystems behind them.
For connected infrastructure and autonomous system OEMs, security, regulation, and supply chain strategy are becoming increasingly intertwined.
